<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tram-atized in Jackson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.powderblog.com/teton-skiing/2008/12/21/tram-atized-in-jackson/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.powderblog.com/teton-skiing/2008/12/21/tram-atized-in-jackson</link>
	<description>Powder skiing in the Tetons and beyond.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:55:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: snowman</title>
		<link>http://www.powderblog.com/teton-skiing/2008/12/21/tram-atized-in-jackson/comment-page-1#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>snowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 22:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powderblog.com/?p=92#comment-195</guid>
		<description>I too have concerns about heavier skier traffic in Rendezvous. I didn&#039;t ski it often enough the past coupe of years when it was served by the low capacity double chair- did it get moguled up too badly? I do remember doing laps on it years ago when it was served by a surface lift and I didn&#039;t think it suffered , but maybe I was just there in snowy periods. 

I&#039;m curious, do you know if the JHMR actually spends much time having a constructive dialog with its users to factor in their points of view when they plan their projects?

Thanks for commenting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have concerns about heavier skier traffic in Rendezvous. I didn&#8217;t ski it often enough the past coupe of years when it was served by the low capacity double chair- did it get moguled up too badly? I do remember doing laps on it years ago when it was served by a surface lift and I didn&#8217;t think it suffered , but maybe I was just there in snowy periods. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious, do you know if the JHMR actually spends much time having a constructive dialog with its users to factor in their points of view when they plan their projects?</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ski Waheenie</title>
		<link>http://www.powderblog.com/teton-skiing/2008/12/21/tram-atized-in-jackson/comment-page-1#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Ski Waheenie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powderblog.com/?p=92#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Totally agree with you, except for the fact that I don&#039;t think more skier capacity on in Rendezvous Bowl would be a good thing.  When the old tram was around, I never really rode it because the line was too long.  So I was actually stoked when they put the little lift up the bowl.  

The new tram is great for those days when you want to quickly access the top to get out of bounds, but having a gondola directly to Thunder would be so much more awesome.  

Bottom line- the Jackon Hole marketing department is way out of line.  They have created one stupid campaign after another- first overdoing  the &quot;old west&quot; theme, then presenting the resort as &quot;family friendly&quot; and now making such a huge fuss over the tram.  If JHMR didn&#039;t waste so much money on stupid projects (to name a few- 1.  a $10million restaurant built in a slide path, 2. a chairlift to Casper restaurant that noone uses, 3. a new overpriced Tram), they might be able to pay their employees a decent wage and offer better deals to locals on season passes.  

Better stop here before I get too worked up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with you, except for the fact that I don&#8217;t think more skier capacity on in Rendezvous Bowl would be a good thing.  When the old tram was around, I never really rode it because the line was too long.  So I was actually stoked when they put the little lift up the bowl.  </p>
<p>The new tram is great for those days when you want to quickly access the top to get out of bounds, but having a gondola directly to Thunder would be so much more awesome.  </p>
<p>Bottom line- the Jackon Hole marketing department is way out of line.  They have created one stupid campaign after another- first overdoing  the &#8220;old west&#8221; theme, then presenting the resort as &#8220;family friendly&#8221; and now making such a huge fuss over the tram.  If JHMR didn&#8217;t waste so much money on stupid projects (to name a few- 1.  a $10million restaurant built in a slide path, 2. a chairlift to Casper restaurant that noone uses, 3. a new overpriced Tram), they might be able to pay their employees a decent wage and offer better deals to locals on season passes.  </p>
<p>Better stop here before I get too worked up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tram-atized in Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.powderblog.com/teton-skiing/2008/12/21/tram-atized-in-jackson/comment-page-1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Tram-atized in Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powderblog.com/?p=92#comment-96</guid>
		<description>[...] Resaski Blog wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Resaski Blog wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

